Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation menu
Skip to site footer
Open Menu
Home
About the Journal
Overview
Vision
Mission
Objectives
Scope and Subject Boundaries
Governance & Editorial Structure
Journal Steering Committee (JSC)
Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Editorial Policy and Ethical Standards
Editorial Policy and Scope
Peer Review and Editorial Procedures
Authorship and Contributions
Originality, Plagiarism, and Research Integrity
Conflict of Interest (COI)
Data Availability and Transparency
Post-Publication Policies
Open Access and Licensing
Ethical Oversight and Compliance
Journal Ethics Committee (JEC)
Confidentiality and Privacy
Submit Manuscript
Guidelines for Authors /Submission Guideline
Author Guidelines
Author(s) Contributions
AUTHOR(S) AGREEMENT FORM
Copyright and Licensing Policy
Publication Charges
Citation Style and Referencing
General Guidelines
Peer Review Policy and Process
Overview of Peer Review Process
Stages of Peer Review
Reviewer Selection Criteria
Review Guidelines and Evaluation Criteria
Reviewer Responsibilities
Handling of Revisions
Confidentiality and Anonymity
Appeal and Re-review Policy
Ethical Handling of Reviewers
Reviewer Recognition and Evaluation Process
Quality Assurance
Plagiarism and Similarity Check Policy
Indexing and Abstracting
Publication Frequency and Format
Announcements
Submissions
Search
Home
/
Ethical Handling of Reviewers
Ethical Handling of Reviewers
Reviewers must decline reviews in case of conflict of interest or lack of expertise
Delays or unethical conduct may result in removal from the reviewer database
Reviewer contributions are formally acknowledged annually
Information
For Readers
For Authors
For Librarians
